Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Dark Age"

(Please read.)
 
(Answer)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Should there be a subset in this category for units featured post-Age of Destruction?
 
Should there be a subset in this category for units featured post-Age of Destruction?
 +
 +
:No, there should be.  Entire era as far canon Battletech's writing staff said that its  suppose called Dark Age. Unless they specify other wise. We don't know when the Dark Age ended. Age of Destruction is purely brand name and not name of "Age" like Dark Age become. Thats my two-cents -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 04:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:32, 29 August 2009

Should there be a subset in this category for units featured post-Age of Destruction?

No, there should be. Entire era as far canon Battletech's writing staff said that its suppose called Dark Age. Unless they specify other wise. We don't know when the Dark Age ended. Age of Destruction is purely brand name and not name of "Age" like Dark Age become. Thats my two-cents -- Wrangler 04:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)